Posté le 27/05/2025 00:29
I'm guessing that the other types were actually meant for Casio BASIC, because add-in's came later?
Planète Casio v4.3 © créé par Neuronix et Muelsaco 2004 - 2025 | Il y a 51 connectés | Nous contacter | Qui sommes-nous ? | Licences et remerciements
Planète Casio est un site communautaire non affilié à Casio. Toute reproduction de Planète Casio, même partielle, est interdite.
Les programmes et autres publications présentes sur Planète Casio restent la propriété de leurs auteurs et peuvent être soumis à des licences ou copyrights.
CASIO est une marque déposée par CASIO Computer Co., Ltd
Citer : Posté le 27/05/2025 08:42 | #
I would suggest, especially now, with PythonExtra being a good candidate for game and application development, to add a category 'Programmes Python' or equivalent if it is not too complex for v4.3.
For S-SHT, to be honnest, I don't know how this can be handled, I suspect you are the only one to create content with that technology Calamari
Citer : Posté le 27/05/2025 08:57 | #
For S-SHT, to be honnest, I don't know how this can be handled, I suspect you are the only one to create content with that technology Calamari
You can be the second!
As for Python, for better or worse, it seems to be replacing Casio BASIC, I agree it makes sense to have its own category if it's not too hard. It might also be useful to have some standard way of indicating whether a Python script requires PythonExtra and/or the minimum PE version? Although, I suppose just noting it in the description could be enough. If someone runs it and gets errors they'd probably come back and realize where they went wrong. I suppose if a breaking change is ever made to PE, the older version of PE would need to be kept around for compatibility, or the broken scripts would need to be updated; this would be another case where storing the PE version number might be useful.
“They call me the king of the spreadsheets, got 'em all printed out on my bedsheets.” — “Weird Al” Yankovic
Citer : Posté le 27/05/2025 15:32 | #
Having add-ins as a whole category is not great. It dates back to when add-ins were a clear minority. It's not the case anymore so putting them all here would lose information about the kind of game.
Adding categories and things in the website is actually not that easy (lots of duplication and many string-based encodings that are hard to track). Cleaning up the games database is a big motivation for v5 so there's a trade-off between spending time on this version or pushing v5 instead.
Citer : Posté le 27/05/2025 17:33 | #
One vote for pushing v5 here !!
(PS : if I can help, let me know how)
Citer : Posté le 27/05/2025 19:59 | #
Having add-ins as a whole category is not great. It dates back to when add-ins were a clear minority. It's not the case anymore so putting them all here would lose information about the kind of game.
Adding categories and things in the website is actually not that easy (lots of duplication and many string-based encodings that are hard to track). Cleaning up the games database is a big motivation for v5 so there's a trade-off between spending time on this version or pushing v5 instead.
Right, but I'm trying to get my add-in games included, right now they're excluded since they're not part of your search criteria (which is completely my fault, as I should have selected add-in when I created them, but I didn't know).
“They call me the king of the spreadsheets, got 'em all printed out on my bedsheets.” — “Weird Al” Yankovic
Citer : Posté le 28/05/2025 22:19 | #
All of them are in the export I made so no worries there.